Your Interests
Sunday, August 27, 2017
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
Scope of Problem Using Evidentiary Information
Every day-to-day effort to provide mental health service to psychiatric patients at the community mental health sites has proven to be a struggle. Several patients would be scheduled with Psychiatrists and registered nurses (RNs) for medication management and treatment, yet, less than fifty percent (50%) would show up. Evidently, within short period of time, clinicians would receive unfavorable events reports, such as, emergency psychiatric/medical hospitalization, incarceration, suicidal episode, and so on.
Having psychiatric patients to stay compliant with treatments has been a big challenge for decades. Rao, George, Sudarshan, & Begum, (2017) defined treatment compliance as “the extent to which a person’s behavior coincides with medical or health advice” (p. 69). Then, further defined non- compliance as, “opposite of compliance” (Rao, et al, 2017, p. 69). Compliance is a major part of determinant of patients’ health outcome. Most Mental health patients have minimal or no insight of their illnesses due to cognitive impairment. As a result, they end up making poor health decisions, engaged in risky behaviors, and, consequently resulting to poor health outcomes. However, if psychiatric patients could stay compliant, there would be symptom control; decreased relapse and hospitalization; and overall improvement in their physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning
Identification, Definition and Explanation of Problem
It has been identified that, majority of the reasons for
non-compliance among psychiatric patients are, but not limited to, forgetfulness,
treatment complexity and fear of medication adverse reaction (Mukattash,
et al, 2016); lack of family support to bring
patients for appointments as a result of frustration in dealing with mentally
ill; patients’ dislike to visit mental health facilities due to associated
stigma by the society (Taghva,
et al 2017); poor patients’
motivation to go for appointments as part of negative psychotic symptoms; lack of
funds for transportation; indifferent attitude of patients to treatment, and poor
choice due to poor insight. Meanwhile, clinicians and mental health providers
continue to implement different strategies and approach to address the challenges
of non-compliance among psychiatric patients. Some of which are listed below.
Existing Efforts and Approach to Support Treatment Compliance
- · Prior appointment reminder calls by providers
- · Community support staff home visits
- · Written appointment cards
- · Patients’ personal calendar
- · Family members’ notification
Description of Proposed Interventions/Solutions
First, Providers should be granted licensure to provide telehealth
across the nation irrespective of their patients’ location, so as to provide
increased patients’ opportunity to different providers of choice, encourage
patient-provider relationship, and consequently increase compliance. Secondly, because psychiatric
patients are mostly paranoid, and experience fear to make change, which
inadvertently create constrains in their treatments, therefore, providing
adequate patients’ information, and maintaining patients’ privacy and confidentiality
would increase confidence, and reduce paranoia. Thirdly, to support patients’
and providers’ awareness of telehealth, psychiatric providers and nurses must
be well trained on how to efficiently provide telehealth care to mental health
population; at the same time, educate patients and family members, on benefits of
telehealth and its functionalities to aid acceptance of technology. Lastly, all
individuals diagnosed with mental illness should be provided free personal
encrypted smart phones via a government certified information technology vendor,
to ensure patients’ privacy and confidentiality. And, in addition, the providers’
access portal should allow patients to leave messages at any given time for
easy access and quick providers’ response to crisis.
How will Telehealth Benefit Nursing Practice and Improve Psychiatric Patients’ Outcomes
·
Easy access to care:
Providers can reach patients without having to travel to facilities
·
Easy crisis management: Patients
and providers can be reached at any time, at their comfort zone and on timely
manner, irrespective of distance or location, in event of any psychiatric crisis, reducing psychiatric relapse, as opposed to restricted eight to five (8 :00 am -5:00 pm) schedule
·
Patients’ privacy and
confidentiality: Patients would have their privacy with their providers due to
use of personal smart phones, instead of a facility location where others are present
·
Increased patients’ autonomy:
Patients would be more involved in decision making of their care, as they
directly deal and communicate with providers without intermediary, or interruption of sessions
·
Decreased adverse events: Due to easy access to care, there would be decreased
unusual events, like suicide episode, and serious treatment/medication adverse
reaction
·
Decreased hospitalization
cost: Easy patients’ access to psychiatric care would result in increase
treatment compliance, reduce psychiatric relapse, and decrease hospital visits.
·
Increased providers’ revenue
stream: As long as consumers are accessible through their respective smart
phones, there would be decreased no-show billing, and increased revenue stream
for providers.
Moving Forward
As telehealth is making its ways to improve patients’ health
outcome in other areas of healthcare, fully adopting telehealth in psychiatry
would be a better option to make mental health populations live a more
meaningful life, through a technology that supports treatment compliance. And by
the year 2025, I expect to see all individuals diagnosed with mental illness to
have access to psychiatric healthcare through telehealth.
References
Mukattash, T. L., Alzoubi, K. H., Abu El-Rub, E.,
Jarab, A. S., Al-Azzam, S. I., Khdour, M., & ... Al Hamarneh, Y. N. (2016).
Prevalence of non-adherence among psychiatric patients in Jordan, a cross
sectional study. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 24(3), 217-221.
doi:10.1111/ijpp.12239
Rao, K. N., George, J., Sudarshan, C.
Y., & Begum, S. (2017). Treatment compliance and noncompliance in
psychoses. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 59(1), 69-76.
doi:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_24_17
Sewell,
J. (2016). Informatics and Nursing: Opportunities and Challenges (5th Ed.).
Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Taghva, Arsia, Zahra
Farsi, Yavar Javanmard, Afsaneh Atashi, Ahmad Hajebi, and Mojgan Khademi. 2017.
"Stigma Barriers of Mental Health in Iran: A Qualitative Study by
Stakeholders of Mental Health." Iranian Journal of Psychiatry 12, no. 3:
163-171. CINAHL Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed August 27, 2017).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)